Before you click to a less scary sounding post, let’s take just a minute and look at what
kind of master plan we’re discussing. A master educational plan takes a look at
the whole picture, not just, “What are we going to do today, Mom?” It takes
into account our children’s learning styles and our family philosophies as well
as the subjects and topics that will be taught each year. As fun as choosing a
new, random topic each week can be, doing so without a plan can be more
detrimental than helpful to our overall educational goals. Yes, I do believe in
teaching to our children’s interests—to a certain point. The problem with that
is that they’re kids; they don’t know what they need to learn and what they
don’t know. If it were up to my daughters, we would not own a math textbook!
Are our kids going to be
prepared for a formal high school or even college plan? What happens if we
study medieval history three years in a row and never get around to studying
the world wars of the past century? These are some of the questions driving the
idea of a master plan. Providing a structure for not only math and English, but
also for history and science gives a framework around which our kids can fit odd
facts, war dates, inventions, and people. After all, studying World War II
wouldn’t make much sense without having studied World War I and other events of
the twentieth century. Randomness is like having paper figurines to represent
major people and events in history and telling our children to put them in
order on a blank wall—with no dates or references. One of the goals of
homeschooling is to produce well-rounded young adults. Academically speaking,
this means that they will have a general knowledge of most of the major
historical events and scientific inventions and literature from different time
periods and countries.
When should we implement
our master plans? The earlier the better. But what if our current intention is
just to homeschool for kindergarten, or just through fifth or sixth grade? Then
a master plan is even more important. If our goal is to eventually matriculate
our children (back) into the school system—public or private—we for sure want
them to be prepared and on par with the rest of their classmates. This is not
to say that we should use the exact same curriculum that those schools use, but
it is to say that if we know a child will go to the public school in grade six
and study early American history, it probably would be a good idea to study
something other than that in fifth grade. Many books and websites that detail
in general what should be learned in which grade. For instance, no matter which
curriculum we decide to use, we probably want to make sure that our kids master
multiplication by the end of fourth grade at the latest.
How can we implement this
great master plan once we have it down on paper? We start by working backwards.
We know where we want our kids to be ten years from now, five years from now,
or even one year from now, so how are we going to get there? It’s obvious that
math and grammar need to be taught incrementally, and most math and grammar
textbooks follow the same general flow of thought. Personally, I think it’s
best to stick to one publisher/curriculum for those subjects so as to provide
the most thoughtful flow and to avoid as many gaps as possible. Of course, if a
particular curriculum is just not working for a certain child, by all means,
switch it out. For history and science, if we want to make sure we’re covering
all the bases, it’s best to lay out a plan for each year. I prefer to stick
with the same publisher/curriculum provider for these subjects as well, for
that very reason. Publishers tend to make their subjects flow from one year to
the next. Children also know what to expect if we use the same
publisher/curriculum from year to year. Of course, I certainly understand the
need to switch things up occasionally, but I always stick to the master plan as
far as the topics being studied. If you love the idea of unit studies, try to
make sure they fit into the general flow of the historical period or scientific
area you’re studying for the year.
Here is one suggestion for
a master plan covering history and science that can be implemented with just
about any curriculum. Study these subjects in three four-year cycles, starting
in first grade. Each cycle would cover different topics, have different reading
materials, and, of course, require increasingly higher levels of mastery. For
history, break it down like this: year one ancient history, year two medieval
history, year three early American/world history, and year four modern
American/world history. Science could look like this: year one life science
(animals, people, and plants), year two earth science/astronomy, year three chemistry,
and year four physics. Or, years one and two of science could be swapped to
correspond with the traditional high school science cycles. I must give credit
to Susan Wise Bauer of The Well-Trained
Mind for this original idea. This plan makes it easier to teach more than
one child at a time; just have each child in the same time period for history
and the same general topic for science. Younger children can begin in whichever
year’s cycle the older children are studying; they’ll eventually cover all of
the same materials.
This article was originally published in the September/October 2011 issue of Home School Enrichment, in my "The Organized Homeschool" column.
No comments:
Post a Comment